Romano Response to Plan Review

From: James V. Sansone <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2020 3:40 PM
To: Daniela M. Pavone <[email protected]> ([email protected]) <[email protected]>

Subject: Roman vs. FVE HOA

Good Afternoon Daniela,

I write to you today to address your concerns about Mr. Romano moving forward with the construction of the two structures at issue in this lawsuit.   Your correspondence indicated that you require clarification as soon as possible so the HOA can obtain a TRO if necessary. 

I spoke with Mr. Romano this morning.  He has assured me that he has no current intention of moving forward with the construction of the two structures at issue in this lawsuit. 

Notwithstanding Mr. Romano’s current intention, he firmly believes that his plans are approved as an operation of the CC&Rs based on the HOA’s failure to follow protocol strictly.  Moreover, Mr. Romano is also of the position that regardless of how contentious this litigation is, the current lawsuit does not provide cover or excuse for the HOA not making its decision on plan approval within the specified time frames found within the CC&Rs. 

Mr. Romano has instructed me to reiterate to your office that he is in pro per as our representation is limited.  Our services to Mr. Romano ebb and flow based on specific instructions from Mr. Romano.  He is insistent that any issues your office has with him, his plan submission, or any perceived activities on his property must be directed to him.  We are only to be copied on such communication and will only respond when instructed to do so by Mr. Romano.   

I hope this satisfies your concerns and clarifies issues.